Legal Advocacy Issues
Department of Justice
Effective March 15, 2011 From Department of Justice 28 CFR Part 35, [CRT Docket No. 105; AG Order No. 3180-2010] RIN 1190-AA46. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services; Corrections: B. Substantive Error. As published, the final rule contains an error in wording that may cause confusion over the interpretation of the rule. Specifically, in Sec. 35.104 (“Definitions”), the “service animal” definition states as follows: “The work or tasks performed by a service animal must be directly related to the handler’s disability.” Because a service animal is not always controlled by the individual with a disability, the service animal’s “handler” is not necessarily the individual with a disability. To clear up any confusion, the word “handler’s” should be replaced with the word “individual’s” in that sentence. Similar use of the word “handler” in the section-by-section analysis contained in Appendix A to part 35 also needs to be changed to “individual” so it is clear that the individual with a disability does not necessarily need to be the animal’s handler in order to be covered by the rule’s provisions. (To read the entire correction, click here.)
State of Indiana
Note to Karen Shirk from Claudia M., May 2009 The law passed and contains some very favorable language (includes specifically “autism service animals”). I was not able to get three-person-teams included in the language but my state representative supports that addition and may propose that addition next session. Thought you’d like to know.
Note from Karen Shirk: Claudia and family have been working with law makers and we helped with language and they did get the law changed to include specifically SCHOOLS and Autism Assistance Dogs. This is Indiana State law. So now we have Jake’s Law in Maryland (Jake and Service Dog, Sienna) and Bekah and Grizwald’s family changed the law in Virginia. And the Oda family (Donnie and service dog, Marble) changing Ohio law! ONE STATE AT A TIME.
State of Virginia
March 10, 2008 A link to the first law passed as a result of 4 Paws families advocating for change, including the three-unit team as a LEGAL service dog team under the law! CHAPTER 506. An Act to amend and reenact ? 51.5-44 of the Code of Virginia, relating to service dogs; training. [H 853] Approved March 10, 2008. Kudos Virginia!
State of Maryland
May 27, 2008 Seizure alert dogs, owners will now get equal access. Kudos Maryland!